Rare Summer Snow Hits Alaska; Bering Strait Sea Ice Refuses To Melt; + NASA/NOAA Erase The Arctic’s 1940s “Warming Blip”

Cap Allon

Rare Summer Snow Hits Alaska

Unusual summer flurries have settled in Denali, South-Central Alaska this week where the mercury has been holding some -6C below the climatological norm.

According to climate specialist Rick Thoman, “an inch or two of slushy snow” accumulated near the Denali NPS Headquarters on Tuesday morning, which “would appear to be the fourth occurrence on record, since 1923, of accumulating [summer] snow at the HQ.”

Rare summer snow at Denali NPS HQ, Alaska, Aug 9, 2022.


Bering Strait Sea Ice Refuses To Melt

And while we’re up in these northern reaches, let’s note another rare feat: Summer Sea Ice in the Bering Strait.

On August 9–the latest data point–ice has remained along the north Chukotka coast thanks, in part, to persistent chills and north winds. The ice has now even shifted south of East Cape, as visualized by NOAA20’s VIIRS false color image:


Northern Hemisphere sea ice has held strong during 2022.

It has refused to melt not only as scheduled by the season but also as demanded by AGW Party scripture.

Wherever you look–whether that be Alaska, the Arctic, or Greenland–sea ice this summer is proving very robust and stubborn.

Taking Greenland, for example, the ice sheet actually saw snow/ice GAINS on Monday, Aug 8 — a reality that the MSM–no surprise–has refused to report on, despite its rarity and despite its obvious signal that the end may not be so nigh, after all:

Greenland Is *GAINING* Ice In The Middle Of Summer


NASA/NOAA Erase The Arctic’s 1940s “Warming Blip”

The evidence suggests that NASA/NOAA have been cooling the past in order to fabricated/exaggerate a warming trend, all in a desperate attempt to prop-up their failing AGW hypothesis.

Also, why are the scientists at the heart of the AGW Party so desperate to evade scrutiny at all costs? What do they have to hide?

To that point, watch the awkward interview with NASA’s Gavin Schmidt embedded below.

Schmidt only agreed to speak if it “wasn’t a debate”.

And while I urge you watch the entire video, particularly the parts with the excellent Dr Roy Spencer (a real climate scientist btw), skip to 2:00 and then to 6:30 if you’re interested in Schmidt’s embarrassing “la la la–fingers in ears” evading tactics.


So NASA refuses to debate an issue which supposedly negatively impacts every living organism on the planet. And 2013 should be considered ‘the good old days’! Now, the climate hucksters have worked a position where so-called “skeptics” (such as Dr Spencer) have no platform at all. Today, even this kind of non-debate would never be agreed to.

Turning to the ever-mounting case against NASA/NOAA–namely with regards to their temperature graphs–they probably have good reason to evade scrutiny.

Serving as just one example, “government agencies have been erasing the 1940s warmth in the Eastern Arctic for decades,” writes Tony Heller.

This is what the raw data for Iceland’s capital Reykjavík looks like:

[Measured – NASA]


And this is what the data looks like after NASA made its ‘adjustments’:

[NASA link removed]


Note the tactic: cool the past in order to fabricate a warming trend where there was none before:

A comparison [NASA link removed]


NASA’s removing of the 1940s warmth–without any justification–was discussed by the world’s leading climate experts in this Climategate email:


Those at the Icelandic Met Office (IMO) couldn’t understand this ‘historical tampering’.

Trausti Jónsson, senior meteorologist at the IMO wrote in 2012 that his office was never advised as to the reason for them.

Furthermore, Jónsson said the temperature corrections “are grossly in error in the case of Reykjavík…” And when asked if the IMO intended to modify its data to match that of NASA’s/NOAA’s, Jónsson replied with a succinct: “no”.

Years later, Jónsson–rather suspiciously–flipped his story, going from “the corrections are grossly in error” to “the adjustments are quite sound” — and absolutely no explanation for this change of heart was given.

Equally suspicious, following the kickback received for their Icelandic temperature tampering debacle, Schmidt and his merry band of NASA frauds quietly stopped adjusting Reykjavík’s data, without comment–thus confirming that the removal of the 1940s warmth was without justification.

Such temperature ‘adjustments’ aren’t just confined to the Eastern Arctic, of course.

Government book-cooking encompasses the entire globe.

Back in 1999, NASA’s graphs showed, unambiguously, that there was no net global warming from 1866 to 1976, and also that 1877 was the warmest year during that interval:

Archived version linked here.


Note also that NASA’s 1999 graph looks nothing like Michael Mann’s infamous hockey stick blade, where Mann ‘appears’ a roughly 0.4C net warming from 1866 to 1976:


This, once again, deserves explanation; but, once again, NASA/NOAA proved none.

Don’t fall for ‘warm-mongering’ political agendas supported ONLY by questionable datasets–at best.

Not least when the future, according to the real, objective science–which looks at solar activity and other cosmological forcings–suggests something more like the below is on the cards; the next Grand Solar Minimum — the Modern “Eddy” Minimum — the return of the COLD TIMES:


Social Media channels are restricting Electroverse’s reach: Twitter are purging followers, while Facebook are labeling posts as “false” and have slapped-on crippling page restrictions. And most recently, the CCDH stripped the website of its ability to advertise with Google.

So, be sure to subscribe to receive new post notifications by email. And also consider becoming a Patron or donating via Paypal (button located in the sidebar >>> or scroll down if on mobile). The site receives ZERO funding, and never has.

Any way you can, help me spread the message so others can survive and thrive in the coming times.

[A few of the] Scientists who warn of a coming Grand Solar Minimum and Little Ice Age