Articles 

Top Climate Scientist Slams Climate Alarm: Carbon Dioxide Is A “Particularly Ridiculous” Choice As A Pollutant

Top Climate Scientist Slams Climate Alarm

Warming by carbon dioxide is logarithmic due to ‘saturation’ within the infrared spectrum, and any future doubling of the gas in the atmosphere will be associated with the same warming of around 1°C.

This is considered obvious by atmospheric scientist and Emeritus Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT, and hardly controversial — although in today’s politicized environment, where CO2 has been forged into a scary and taxable ‘stick’ to bop the global population over the head with, this thinking does fatally undermine the ‘settled’ science concept of the AGW Party and so is regarded as heresy punishable by censorship and demonetization.

Professor Lindzen notes that the present “absurd ‘scientific’ narrative” leaves us with a quasi-religious movement — atop of all this has been the ”constant Goebellian repetition by the media of climate alarm”.

In a paper published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), Lindzen warns that unless we wake up to the absurdity of the motivating narrative, “this is only likely to be the beginning of the disasters that will follow from the current irrational demonization of CO2”, disasters which include the “hobbling” of Western energy systems.


Carbon Dioxide Is A “Particularly Ridiculous” Choice As A Pollutant

Lindzen considers it “absurd” to assume that the controlling factor for temperature changes Earth’s complex three-dimensional climate system is the small contribution of CO2.

He notes the evidence from the Antarctica Vostok ice core that showed cooling preceded decreases in COduring the glaciation cycles of the last 700,000 years; and for the paleoclimatic record, which goes back 600 million years, it is shows “no suggestion of any correlation with carbon dioxide at all.”

Carbon dioxide is a “particularly ridiculous” choice as a pollutant, continues Lindzen, because its primary role is as a fertilizer and currently “almost all plants are starved of CO2”.

And so it follows, if we were to remove 60% of CO2 from the atmosphere, the consequences would be dire, but not via a drop in the global temperature, as the modern day propaganda would have you believe, but rather from mass dying of vegetation, leading to “death by starvation for all animal life”.

The “one dimensional” view of the world’s climate, and the way the ‘greenhouse’ effect and the role of CO2 dominates the warming narrative, is deeply concerning to Lindzen, who notes that the Earth has many climate regimes and that there have been “profound” changes in temperature between the tropics and the polar regions over millennia. During these times, the temperature at the tropics has remained little changed, a situation we observe in the current climate record.

Lindzen argues that temperature changes are caused by dynamic heat flows in the atmosphere and the oceans caused by latitudinal differences in temperatures –or ‘baroclinic instability’ to give it a scientific term– concluding that changes in average temperature “are primarily due to changes in the tropic-to-pole difference, and not to changes in the greenhouse effect”.


The Politics

It has proven very profitable to blame ALL climate changes on just one trace atmospheric gas. TPTB have really outdone themselves with this one. The corruption of scientific integrity and the demonizing of alternative lines of thinking are the most malevolent achievements in human history — to control the direction of 8 billion souls with ‘Their Science’ is shocking.

Lindzen has been a long time critic of the AGW Party.

In his GWPF paper, he notes the words of late U.S. President Eisenhower, uttered in 1961:

The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

Dwight D. Eisenhower
34th U.S. President


Lindzen says the UN-backed IPCC is “government-controlled and only issues government-dictated findings”. And, along with fellow atmospheric scientist Professor William Happer of Princeton, told a recent U.S. Government inquiry that current climate science literature was “a joke”, and was “pal review, not peer review”.

The links between climate science and grant-providing politicians are well known, and not particularly well concealed. In 2013, then-head of the IPCC, Rajendra Pachauri, told the Guardian: “We are an intergovernmental body and we do what the governments of the world want us to do. If the governments decide we should do things differently and come up with a vastly different set of products we would be at their beck and call.”


“CO2 Has Almost No Effect On Global Temperature”

It should be obvious free from the clutches of AGW Party brainwashing that one of the great drivers of continual changes in the climate is heat exchange within both the atmosphere and the Earth’s surface.

It should also be noted that our current understanding of the climate system is very limited. Vast gaps in our knowledge base exist, gaps that have been opportunistically exploited and filled by the ‘carbon dioxide boogeyman’.

new paper written by meteorologist William Kininmonth, former consultant to the World Meteorological Organisation’s Commission for Climatology and former head of the Australian Government’s National Climate Center, argues that the oceans are the “vital inertial and thermal flywheels” of the climate system.

If one wants to control climate, it will be necessary to control the oceans, Kininmonth points out, adding that “Efforts to decarbonize in the hope of cooling the planet will be in vain” as CO2 has “minimal effect” on the Earth’s temperature and climate.

Kininmonth is confident that the recent gentle warming is “probably simply the result of fluctuations in the ever-changing ocean circulation”. CO2 “must be recognized” as a very minor contributor to the observed warming, one that is unlikely to prolong the warming trend beyond the peak generated by the natural oceanic oscillations. He explains that the main driver of global temperature is the movement of energy in water, both in the oceans and the atmosphere after evaporation.

Tropical oceans have warmed recently, though not due to rising atmospheric CO2, as the dogma would have you believe, but rather by a reduction of heat as ocean currents have observably slowed. Heat has been exchanged with the tropical atmosphere, and transported by the winds to enhance Arctic warming which has been greater in recent years than elsewhere on the globe.

Ocean temps have warmed much less in the tropics than in the Arctic, and Arctic warming has occurred predominantly during the cold winter half of the year, when the surface is largely in darkness, implying, according to Kininmonth, that it can only be the result of heat transport from warmer latitudes.

Kininmonth’s conclusions, while open for scientific debate, do offer a plausible explanation as to why temperatures at the South Pole have barely moved for 50+ years. And to that point, ‘global’ warming should mean exactly that, right? Yet the AGW Party routinely fails to explain how the Arctic can warm yet the Antarctic remain stable (or even cool, as some data suggest).


Imprecise science often ends up being fed into climate models, along with improbable guesses of massive CO2-caused future global warming. But as Dr. John Christie, Professor of Atmospheric and Earth Sciences at the University of Alabama, recently noted: “Models fail to reproduce accurate energy flows, and this is the guts of how the climate system works.”

The truth always outs, eventually. The fabric of reality can only be bent for so long. Unfortunately in this case, though, it is looking like billions of people will first have to endure immense pain –via fuel poverty/shortages and energy-driven inflation– before the penny finally drops.

Related posts

20 Thoughts to “Top Climate Scientist Slams Climate Alarm: Carbon Dioxide Is A “Particularly Ridiculous” Choice As A Pollutant”

  1. Roland

    My intuition and (basic science knowledge) is pretty much always correct.
    Humans like to over-complicate things.
    Less solar output explains the HUGE colder than average SST ocean anomalies at the equator and below it – we are seeing right now.
    This paper showed a perfect correlation between solar cycles and La Nina events.
    The mini ice age we are entering sill no doubt see agriculture destroyed in the western states via drought. And the bolshevik communists in charge will never produce more dams – it’s game over for individual freedom actually, but thats another story.

    Here’s the paper / article on La Nina southern oscillation-Solar Cycles.

    btw – the pacific ocean currents are clearly stopping/ slowing – look at the crazy SST anomalies past few years. – this is where climate starts.

    https://notrickszone.com/2021/05/19/amazing-results-la-ninas-begin-when-22-year-solar-cycle-ends-now-6th-consecutive-time-since-1960/

    1. Dirk Pitt

      Solar min between SC23 and SC24 was record spotless days and then SC 24 was historically low sunspots followed by record solar min. All very low solar output
      and then we had a record El Nino followed by La Nada and then a prolonged moderate La Nina where we are now. If they matched solar output there shouldn’t have been a record El Nino and La Nina should have been record low. They don’t match. Sum ting wong..
      https://www.spaceweather.com/images2022/29sep22/TCI_Daily_NO_Power_Percentiles.png
      https://ggweather.com/enso/oni.htm
      What’s to stop it from being another record El Nino in a few years? SC 25 is predicted to be bigger than SC 24, more output.

      ’09 was so cold and wet here there was no corn crop.In ’12 the solar flares were so hot in July everyone was hiding in their caves and by ’15 the ocean got so hot it killed most of the salmon and all the starfish melted in place. There was no snow in the mountains for ski areas to open that year. Record heat, all from historically low low low solar output. The decarbonizers went nuts, drove me nuts but that train left the station long before.
      On the SST Map, can you only see the blue area and not the orange in the NH?
      https://www.ospo.noaa.gov/data/cb/ssta/ssta.daily.current.png
      How ’bout the animation? Can you only see the blue area and no warmer than normal NH?
      https://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/data/5km/v3.1/current/animation/gif/ssta_animation_90day_large.gif

      Ol’ Dallas got dem global warmin blues, what no solar powered Starlink for onsite updates? Wish I lived in Florida…not.

      1. Dirk Pitt

        NW US is, record warm and dry, should be cool and wet during La Nina. The last three years in Sept and Oct there was snow in the mountains of N America, this year it’s not and there’s no rain in the forecast. Last year there was cold Pacific O temo off W Coast US and now it’s warm N Pacific.
        https://komonews.com/news/local/weather-rare-warmth-to-kick-off-october-could-lead-to-more-seattle-area-records-breaking#

        Kp6 forecast tomorrow from a coronal hole, the sun is going to feel hotter than a low Kp. https://www.solarham.net/geo_forecast.htm

        I wish it would rain so my well doesn’t go dry and I can go pick chanterelle mushrooms. Last year there was an early frost in Sept and the chanterelles never did come back out Finnicky little buggers. This year I haven’t even looked, it’s a tinder box ‘ere. My grapes are getting ripe, I can just walk around and eat grapes. Life is good.

    2. Richard Greene

      THERE IS NO CORRELATION BETWEEN 11 YEAR SUNSPOT CYCLES AND THE GLOBAL AVERAGE TEMPERATTURE SINCE THE MAUNDER MINIMUM ABOUT 300 YEARS AGO

      There is no evidence of any significant solar energy change in 100 years. NASA does claim a small reduction of TOA solar energy since about 1960

      Claims that we are entering a mini ice age are personal speculation about the future climate. Humans have a very poor record of predicting the future climate and there is no reason to believe your prediction will be an exception.

      Climate change is very complicated with far more unanswered question than most branches of science. You have over simplified climate science with your “INTUITION”

      1. Chris Norman

        Which global average temperature? The actual average or the concocted average?

        1. Chris Norman

          And I note you write “significant”. No one knows what is or is not significant. The Sun consists of 99.9% of the mass of the solar system and that it plays no significant roll in climate is intuitively difficult to accept. The problem is that you AGW people used as a starting point the extraordinary assumption that climate change was not solar driven when you didn’t actually know that, then or now.
          AGW holds close parallels to religion.

      2. Ol' Danny Boy

        Claims that we are entering a ‘heating planet’ are personal speculation about future climate. The IPCC and government funded apparatchiks have a very poor record of predicting the future climate and there is no reason to believe ‘pigs at the trough’ predictions will be an exception. FIFY.

        This Dick Greene was inhabiting WUWT but his logic aas always dismantled. AGW party cultist member.

  2. Stuart

    Hi Electro, Thought you’d be interested to know that several of the adds running on your site are pro-global warming. I realise that you don’t have much say over how the adds appear but it’s a crackup when your articles point out the folly of global warming but your revenue, admitedly out of your control, supports the global warming narative. Keep up the good work.
    Regards,
    Stuart.

  3. Linda

    They chose C02 to demonize because we exhale C02. they are anti-human clowns

    1. Hadaqar

      Spot on.
      After the destruction of the farting cows, then they will have to blame it on humans.
      Will humans line up for death to “save the planet”?
      How much destruction between now and then?
      All this aided by intentional diminishing of education.
      Just my ignorant opinion.

      1. Nick

        8 billion kgs emitted daily by humans; then there’s all the other mammals domesticated and wild; how many birds, reptiles, amphibians all exhaling CO2? It’s a good Monty Python sketch actually – being a total farce. Unfortunately, with Malthusian motivations.

  4. Roscomac

    Firstly how can anyone believe anything that alarmists claim ?

    Besides their maths being completely wrong they have totally insane unbelievable basic assumptions such as this beauty from NASA –
    “The amount of heat radiated from the atmosphere to the surface (sometimes called “back radiation) is equivalent to 100 percent of the incoming solar energy. The Earth’s surface responds to the “extra” (on top of direct solar heating) energy by raising its temperature.”

    In case you missed it they claim that the “back-radiation” from about 0.75 grams of CO2 and between 20 to 40 grams of water vapour in every cubic metre of ordinary air with a mass of about 1.2 kilograms has the same heating power as the radiation from the Sun which can raise the temperature of the Moon’s surfaces to 120°C !!

    If you believe that “The amount of heat radiated from the atmosphere to the surface (sometimes called “back radiation) is equivalent to 100 percent of the incoming solar energy.” you’re gullible or deluded.

    Sadly so many believe complete garbage climate “science”..

  5. Crispin Pemberton-Pigott

    “CO2 HAS ALMOST NO EFFECT ON GLOBAL TEMPERATURE”

    This should rather be

    “Additional CO2 has almost no effect on global temperature.” Us adding or removing some will not have a detectable change in the weather. Climate being the average of weather, it means we will cause no detectable change in the climate.

  6. FYI

    CO2, WWIII, undetectable novel killer viruses, mandates, lockdowns, climate/warming hype/agitprop are but a few of many diversions to distract as the large agenda objectives are being shoehorned onto the masses as we enter into the next cyclical “unmentionable cooling/dimming topics/era “.

    David Icke has made some excellent/recent vids linking WEF, Harari/Musk, Kurzweil, Tesla/Neuralink, SpaceX Sats, nano graphene/metals/mRNA injections, AI/Cloud/globalist technocracy/god, digital everything, 5G,transhumanism, eugenical culls etc.

    Posted on 22/29 September 2022
    https://davidicke.com/2022/09/22/yuval-noah-harari-confirming-what-ive-said-is-true/
    https://davidicke.com/2022/09/29/man-of-the-people-no-man-of-the-cult-david-icke-dot-connector-videocast/

    *****BULLETIN ***** NUCLEAR TARGET CITIES SELECTED AND NAMED
    World Hal Turner 29 September 2022 Hits: 35610
    Russia has selected two cities against which it will launch “strategic nuclear weapons.”
    It is important to note, the Russian are saying they will use “strategic” nuclear bombs, NOT “tactical.” These bombs are “city busters.” [no surprise NYC is one of them]
    Full details on tonight’s [29 September 2022] Hal Turner Radio Show.

    30 September 2022
    Today in the grand Hall of St. George inside the Kremlin in Moscow, the former Ukraine territories of Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson, and Zaporozyhe, officially joined the Russian Federation. The document signing ceremony was the highlight of a major speech given by Russian President Vladimir Putin on the state of world affairs and Russia’s Special Military Operation inside Nazi Ukraine.

    World
    COVERT INTEL – Three (3) Nuclear Tipped Missiles Moved to the open
    World Hal Turner 28 September 2022 Hits: 19628

    Subscribers Only —

    It is now CONFIRMED by visual verification through Covert Intel assets that today, Russia re-positioned Three (3) nuclear-capable TU-160 Strategic Bombers to near the Border of Finland. The internal armament of those particular bombers was not subject to visual verification.

    It is also now CONFIRMED by visual verification through Covert Intel assets that Russia has deployed Three (3) Mig-31 aircraft and THREE Kh-47M2 “Kinzhal” hypersonic missiles WITH NUCLEAR WARHEAD TIPS into the enclave of Kaliningrad. The existence of the nuclear warheads on the missiles HAS BEEN VISUALLY CONFIRMED.

    The only Russian nuclear warheads known to be compatible with this missile are 100 kiloton and 500 kiloton warheads.

    The “Kinzhal” is a Russian nuclear-capable hypersonic aero-ballistic air-to-surface missile. It has a range of more than 2,000 km, Mach 12 speed, and an ability to perform evasive maneuvers at every stage of its flight, making it almost impossible to intercept.

    World
    COVERT INTEL – DEPLOYMENT OF 200,000 MORE TROOPS
    World Hal Turner 29 September 2022 Hits: 17499

    This content is for subscribers only —

    Covert Intel sources report: Belarus President Lukashenko has agreed to deploy 120,000 Belarus soldiers during November-February. He also undertakes to supply 100,000 mobilized RUSSIAN soldiers in addition.

    Lukashenko is preparing for a full-scale war, but not necessarily in Ukraine. Likelihood these troops will go after Poland and/or The Baltic states of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.

    Expect that nuking NYC would be a fairly major diversion/distraction.

    1. Doktor seltsame Liebe

      New information surfaces regarding Nordstream pipeline sabotage as Biden regime denies responsibility – October 02, 2022
      Officials at the Swedish National Seismic Network said that the two blasts were so big that one measured 1.9 on the Richter scale and another measured 2.3.
      “The monitoring network said the first explosion occurred on Monday at 2:03 a.m. Swedish time with a magnitude of 1.9 on the Richter scale, followed by a second at 7:04 p.m. on the same day,” a report noted.
      https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-10-02-new-information-regarding-nordstream-pipeline-sabotage-biden-regime.html

      Video: Here’s what a nuke detonated 500 feet underwater looks like
      March 30, 2022 (recent/coincidental timing of article)
      On May 16, 1958, one such test carried out by the U.S. military and the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) aimed to determine the capability of a nuclear weapon detonated underwater. The weapons test, which was captured on video and came to be known as the “Wahoo blast,” showcased what a (puny) 9 kiloton (the equivalent of 9,000 tons of TNT, measured at 38 terajoules or 38 billion joules) atomic bomb would do when detonated in the open ocean at the Pacific Proving Grounds off the coast of the Marshall Islands. According to the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Archives, the Mark 7 “Thor” nuclear bomb used in the test was detonated from 500 feet underwater.
      The 1958 Wahoo atomic blast doesn’t even demonstrate the most powerful nuclear weapons currently available. The B83, the strongest weapon currently in the U.S. nuclear arsenal has an estimated force of 1.2 megatons of TNT (five petajoules, or five quadrillion joules), more than 133 times more powerful than the one detonated in the Wahoo blast. Russia’s most powerful nuclear weapons test, the AN602 (also known as the “Tsar Bomb”) reportedly measured 57 megatons of TNT, more than 47 times more powerful than the U.S. B83 and 6,333 times more powerful than the Wahoo blast.
      https://americanmilitarynews.com/2022/03/video-heres-what-a-nuke-detonated-500-feet-underwater-looks-like/

      Russia and weapons of mass destruction
      Maximum missile range Intercontinental up to 16,000 kilometers
      In 2015, information emerged that Russia may be developing a new nuclear torpedo, the Status-6 Ocean Multipurpose System,[31][32][33] codenamed “Kanyon” by Pentagon officials.[34][35] This weapon is designed to create a tsunami wave up to 500m tall that will radioactively contaminate a wide area on an enemy coasts with cobalt-60, and to be immune to anti-missile defense systems such as laser weapons and railguns that might disable an ICBM.[32][33][35][36][37] Two potential carrier submarines, the Project 09852 Belgorod, and the Project 09851 Khabarovsk, are new boats laid down in 2012 and 2014 respectively.[34][35][38] Status 6 appears to be a deterrent weapon of last resort.[37][38] It appears to be a torpedo-shaped robotic mini-submarine, that can travel at speeds of 185 km/h (100 kn).[37][38][39] More recent information suggests a top speed of 100 km/h (54 kn), with a range of 10,000 km (6,200 mi) and a depth maximum of 1,000 m (3,300 ft).[40] This underwater drone is cloaked by stealth technology to elude acoustic tracking devices.[32][38]
      During an annual state-of-the-nation address given on March 1, 2018, President Vladimir Putin publicly claimed that Russia was now in possession of several new classes of nuclear weapons, including some with capabilities previously speculated to exist. Putin discussed several new or upgraded weapons, including a hypersonic glide vehicle known as the Avangard, capable of performing sharp maneuvers while travelling at 20 times the speed of sound [high mass atomic bullets travelling through air at [Mach 20.04 ≈ 15376.07 mph, or 22551.569 feet per second, or 20 times faster than the muzzle velocity of a .45 while making evasive zig-zag maneuvers] making it “absolutely invulnerable for any missile defense system.”[41] [ ya right] [note recent Top Gun (basically another Mission Impossible propaganda) movie where Tom Cruise breaks Mach 30 in a test plane, merely 50% faster than the new Russian Mach 20 pissin’ contest toys – next speed hurdle, light speed and then warp speed and trillion megaton nukes]
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

      America’s nukes are puny [absolutely tiny] compared to Russia’s
      Russia’s massively powerful RS-28 Sarmat, or simply, the Satan II, carries a whopping 50 megaton nuclear warhead. For those who aren’t fond of arithmetic, that’s the equivalent of 50,000 kilotons and is so powerful that America’s Minuteman III missiles barely even register by comparison.
      America’s nukes are absolutely tiny compared to Russia’s
      America’s ICBM’s would barely be visible compared to the RS-28 Sarmat’s yield.
      Of course, with Russian officials claiming their doomsday-weapon nuclear torpedo carries a positively gigantic 100-megaton warhead, even the Satan II isn’t the biggest kid on the nuclear block.
      Of course, the sheer destructive yield isn’t the only measure of a nation’s nuclear capabilities, but it does pay to maintain a healthy frame of reference when it comes to ways the world could end. After all, when it would take more than 105 American ICBMs to match the destructive power of just one Russian nuke… we should all be a little concerned… unless you’re directly above or below “ground zero”.
      https://www.wearethemighty.com/mighty-tactical/russian-nukes/

      When the Soviets Set Off the Biggest Nuclear Bomb, J.F.K. Didn’t Flinch
      A new study offers insights into how the United States reacted to Tsar Bomba, a planet shaker that made the deadly Hiroshima blast look tame.
      The detonation of the Tsar Bomba, the world’s most powerful nuclear weapon, in the Novaya Zemlya archipelago in the former U.S.S.R. in 1961. – Oct. 30, 2021
      Sixty years ago on Saturday, the Soviet Union detonated the world’s most powerful nuclear weapon, with a force 3,333 times [no kidding… no shortage of NWO threes there, eh?] that of the bomb used on Hiroshima. As the device shattered all records, it sent shock waves through the American defense establishment: How should the United States respond? Did the nation need bigger, more destructive arms? Was it wise to do nothing? What was the
      best way to protect the nation from the deadly stirrings of a belligerent foe?
      Dr. Wellerstein quotes Edward Teller, a main architect of the hydrogen bomb, as announcing at a 1954 meeting of the Atomic Energy Commission that his laboratory was working on two superbomb designs. One would be 1,000 megatons — or 20 times as powerful as the [50 megaton] planet shaker the Soviets would come to detonate in 1961. The other would be 10,000 megatons, or 200 times as destructive. [welcome to the future where our 10,000 megatons bombs are going to be bigger than your puny multi-megaton bombs pissing contest… we can see how that is turning out 60 years later… unless it’s all just more fear porn psyop agitprop theatre (like the space race, speed race et al while the soft kill lethal injections all work their magic]
      Scientists at the secret meeting “were ‘shocked’ [woooo] by his proposal,” Dr. Wellerstein writes, citing an official record. “Most of Teller’s testimony remains classified to this day,” he adds.The Tsar Bomba at an undisclosed location in the 1960s, in footage that was declassified last year. The lobbying intensified as the military added its voice. In 1958, the Air Force chief of staff called for a study of weapons up to 1,000 megatons, Dr. Wellerstein notes. A once-secret Air Force history said enthusiasm for the giant weapon cooled as the study found
      that “lethal radioactivity might not be contained within the confines of an enemy state.” By January 1961, when Kennedy took office, plans for a lesser superbomb had grown more detailed. Dr. Wellerstein reports that the new president was told that a 100-megaton weapon would be six feet wide and 12 feet long — easy for a large bomber to carry and drop. The detonation of Tsar Bomba in October 1961 gave the issue new urgency. Dr. Wellerstein quotes a scientist at the Sandia weapons lab — one of the nation’s three design centers for nuclear arms — as declaring that the American military wanted superbombs “even though no known targets justify such weapons.” In late 1962, Dr. Wellerstein states, the defense secretary, Robert S. McNamara, was informed that the Atomic Energy Commission was ready to build the American equivalent of a Tsar Bomba. The commission reported that experimental devices would be ready for explosive testing by the end of 1963.That year, President Kennedy came to see a way out of the looming arms race. To end surges of deadly radiation from atmospheric testing and the ensuing waves of cancer and other maladies for people downwind, the government’s nuclear experts had learned how to explode their devices underground in Nevada. The rocky ground could bottle up relatively small bursts, but not those of the superbombs, whose vast energies and miles-wide fireballs would burn and break through hard rock to heave radiation into the air. The Nevada site conducted below-ground weapon tests until, with the Cold War’s demise, the long series ended in 1991.
      https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/30/science/tsar-bomba-60.html

      4 Early Signs Of Dementia
      Do You Believe In Conspiracy? It Can Be a Warning Sign of Dementia (popup just now – no joke)
      Here’s the cure.
      https://getagelessbrainnow.com/

      Ever’body lyks fireworks after the Stampede, and and it looks lyk they’s just gettin’ warmed up for the grand finale fireworks show [with nukes bigger than the mini underground ones they used on 9/11] pissin’ contest… and NYC always gets front row seats. Serendipity, eh?
      NYC chimp Eric Adams: New York has a brand, and when people see it, it means something …
      https://www.bitchute.com/video/hwbPDoVaWhIp/

      1. FYI

        World
        COVERT INTEL – DOOMSDAY SUB DEPLOYS
        World Hal Turner 02 October 2022 Hits: 13758

        This content is for Subscribers Only —

        Russia has now DEPLOYED its brand new Belgorad nuclear submarine.

        “Looking Glass” Is Airborne
        01 October 2022
        This afternoon at about 4:00 PM eastern US Time, a Boeing E-6B “Mercury” took off from Washington, DC. This is the U.S. “Looking Glass” – airborne National Command Post to command US nuclear forces worldwide in the event ground stations are all destroyed.

        Russia Halts Natural Gas Flow to Austria

        This is the submarine that can launch the “Poseidon” nuclear torpedo, which carries a multi-megaton nuclear bomb, to detonate around 1 kilometer (or deeper) beneath the sea, and thereby cause a radioactive Tsunami wave to hit the coastline of the target country.

        Estimates of the nuclear bomb blast yield and the Tsunami wave height it will generate, vary wildly.

        Some estimate the nuclear torpedo is carrying a one-hundred-megaton (100Mt) nuclear warhead, capable of generating a 1500 meter tall Tsunami, that would obliterate most of the country it is aimed against.

        What is not disputed (at all) is that the Tsunami wave would be highly radioactive, and would carry so much radiation into the shoreline of the target country, it would be uninhabitable for hundreds of years.

        To the West’s knowledge, the Belgorad is the only submarine designed for this purpose. It is also the largest submarine produced in the world today.

        World
        COVERT INTEL – 180,000 More Troops, 600 Tanks . . .
        World Hal Turner 30 September 2022 Hits: 18781

        This content is for Subscribers Only —

        On September 29, I reported to Subscribers that Belarus President Lukashenko had agreed to send 120,000 Belarus troops into the theater of war in Ukraine from November thru February, and also to undertake supplying an additional 100,000 Russian troops (Story HERE).

        Not only am I now able to confirm this, I am also able to CONFIRM the 100,000 troops from Russia are already pouring into Belarus by train. Tens-of-thousands of them!

        Another 80,000 Russian troops are also — right now — pouring into the Donbas (the name of the region encompassing Luhansk and Donetsk).

        Covert Intel sources now CONFIRM that the 100,000 in Belarus are going to hit the Volyn Region of Ukraine to completely cut off the main routes to/from Poland. This will cut-off a gigantic part of NATO weapons/supplies going to Ukraine.

        In addition, 100,000 more Russian troops are being re-assigned from Belgorod, Kursk, and Rostov, in western Russia, to go into the Donbas and clean up.

        These forces will be bolstered by six hundred (600) tanks and 1200 TOMA being brought in from Asia to the front line.

        An utterly GIGANTIC escalation is about to begin.

        CHOOSE NOW: You will soon be a PREPPER or a CORPSE
        https://www.brighteon.com/09812383-f2f0-4b56-9713-8e21718df304

        BANNED.VIDEO Alex Jones Show – current
        https://www.bitchute.com/channel/kTHKcObj3L1F/

  7. Qiang Li

    I have been trying to find out what is the ideal CO2 level. No success. I am a simple minded engineer and need a goal when working on projects, like driving, need a destination. It seems that the whole world is chasing CO2 without a goal

Leave a Comment

Electroverse